Jim Jordan
The Public Record
Jim Jordan is an American politician and attorney serving as the U.S. Representative for Ohio's 4th congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he is known for his strong conservative stance and is a founding member of the House Freedom Caucus, which advocates for limited government and fiscal responsibility. Throughout his tenure, Jordan has been involved in various legislative efforts and has gained prominence for his role in high-profile investigations and oversight hearings.
That's what's wrong with this thing. That's what this memo exposes today.
Salacious and unverified is how we describe the dossier. It's taken to a secret court to get a secret warrant to spy on a fellow citizen of ours.
I hold up four times where they didn't tell the truth. They didn't tell him that that who would pay for the dossier.
I don't like special counsel. But I want a second special counsel to look at all these issues... and figure out exactly what happened.
I think one of the big takeaways is the exact same people who ran the Clinton investigation, who had a bias in favor of Clinton, who did all of these things that are not the typical practice when you're doing an investigation, those same…
You had, I'm convinced now, the FBI actively seeking with intent, with a plan, actively trying to stop Donald Trump from being president of the United States.
You said the FBI was part of an effort to stop Trump from becoming president of the United States.
Commonsense says when you look at the history of Peter Strzok, when you look at what he said in those text messages, if that doesn't show intent.
You had, I'm convinced now, the FBI actively seeking now with intent, actively trying to stop Donald Trump from being president of the United States.
I'm convinced now the FBI actively seeking with intent, actively trying to stop Donald Trump from being president of the United States.
The vast majority of the FBI are great people doing the Lord's work out there.
What concerns me is the intent to carry out a plan to disrupt the election because as Mr. Strzok said, we can't afford to leave this in we the people's hands.
How do you dismiss the idea that Peter Strzok said we can't afford to let the American people decide who's going to be the next president, we need an insurance policy.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, did the Comey FBI and the Obama Justice Department coordinate with the Democratic Party to go after the Republican Party? Did the FBI and the Justice Department work hand in glove with the…
The Democrat National Committee and the Clinton campaign--which we now know were one and the same--paid the law firm, who paid Fusion GPS, who paid Christopher Steele, who then paid Russians to put together a report that we call a dossier…
But I do not think I am. I think that is exactly what happened. And if it did, it is as wrong as it could be. And people who did that need to be held accountable.
There is nothing prohibiting you, Director. Is there anything prohibiting you from showing this committee what was presented to the FISA court?
It has been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the FBI, taken to the FISA court, and presented as a legitimate intelligence document.
if you had the FBI working with a campaign--the Democrats' campaign--taking opposition research, dressing it all up, and turning it into an intelligence document, and taking it to the FISA court so they could spy on the other campaign: if…





