JD Vance

DOJ looks ready to me. They look committed and ready to go.

What this signifies is that the Justice Department has now moved on to including the former president in their field of interest.

If you can host a Saudi sponsored golf tournament, then I`d say that you are sufficiently prepared emotionally to go back and to testify.

I’ll stop calling people ‘groomers’ when they stop freaking out about bills that prevent the sexualization of my children.

It’s more important that DOJ put its resources against this situation than it do other cases that might be done out in the field.

It looks like they’re separate conspiracies. There’s the fake elector conspiracy. There’s a conspiracy surrounding Mike Pence. There’s a conspiracy surrounding January 6 itself.

The worst risk we run if Trump is never held accountable is that his failed coup attempt becomes the dress rehearsal for the real thing.

The former president engaged in criminal conduct around the big lie on January 6th.

This notion that the president who had a duty, a sworn duty to uphold the Constitution and to take due care, that he did nothing while the capitol was under attack.

The fact that we have not seen much indication that DOJ is using the grand jury.

It will be a very finely tuned decision for her to make about whether she would get some benefit from going through the process with Trump.

One of the most important considerations is whether the potential benefits that she would get from the subpoena if, for instance, she were able to get the former president in front of her grand jury, if that benefit would outweigh the…

This is incredibly important information. This is the kind of information that pretty much mandates thorough investigation by the Justice Department. A big difference between a congressional hearing and a trial is that witnesses aren`t…

If what we’ve seen this term is not judicial activism, I don’t know what it is.

If your worldview tells you that it's bad for women to become mothers but liberating for them to work 90 hours a week in a cubicle at the New York Times or Goldman Sachs, you've been had.

This issue has been politicized. The issue has been so politicized, that it`s become an issue. That`s something that it really is not about.

I have more important crimes to prosecute, I have limited resources, I have to set priorities.

Bottom Dobbs is a decision that sends this message to women, it tells us we cannot be trusted with making decisions about what to do with our own bodies.

The smart move the savvy move here, would be for Eastman to decide to be the John Dean in this story to go in and to tell the truth.

It’s more likely than not that John Eastman and the President of the United States were committing crimes together.

If they`re going to not hold that against the Biden administration, then they`re going to have to have a better sense of why that is.

The first verdict from special prosecutor John Durham`s probe into the origins of the investigation into the former president`s ties to Russia ended in defeat.

It was always a weak case, a case that wasn`t compelling, should have never gone to trial.

This special counsel investigation is out of gas.

There is no reason that we need to have military grade weapons publicly available.