I can understand why the Members on that side don't want to be spoken to directly. Nobody knows what would have been the result of that vote. The least of all who know is the other side. One thing we do know is that it was a perversion. It would have been a perversion to even allow a vote about guns, a vote about guns that would have deprived the District of its own right to decide the issue in order to decide whether it should have a vote. The decision therefore to pull the bill was legal and the delay saved the principle that we should be voting on one basic right, the basic right that is before us today in the House Voting Rights Act.
James Norton: “I can understand why the Members on that side don't want to be spoken to directly. Nobody knows what would have been the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to gun rights and voting rights for the District of Columbia.
Share
More from James Norton
By talking about ``Big Russ'' his father and writing about ``Big Russ,'' Tim was reminding us that he always knew whatever he did on his program, what was important, that family was important. He was not a politician but imagine what kind…
The story of sacrifices made is not a story I should need to tell. All I should need to say is what I leave you with this evening, with my gratitude for your support and friendship. I am an American. I represent 600,000 Americans. Please…
I think the fact that Homeland Security Secretary had this public announcement of removing the software is really alarming.
While the D.C. business community may not have supported the D.C. law that is the subject of this disapproval resolution, their letter states they oppose this disapproval resolution because it would, if enacted, cause ``chaos in the middle…





