Section 101(5) requires that programs provide all students with equal access to the full range of program components and related activities, except that, and I quote, ``nothing in this Act shall be construed to provide any individual with an entitlement to services under this Act.'' My understanding is that the term ``entitlement'' is used here in a very specific manner. It refers to the type of programs where, once an individual meets the eligibility criteria set forth in the Act, that individual thereby has a right to receive services or benefits, such as Pell grants, Medicare, or the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Howard Metzenbaum: “Section 101(5) requires that programs provide all students with equal access to the full range of program components and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the definition of 'entitlement' in relation to a specific Act.
Share
More from Howard Metzenbaum
Then this section serves to clarify that the School-to-Work Opportunities Act does not create such an entitlement, whereby services would have to be provided to any and all eligible individuals?
I am a little confused now when you mention the Kassebaum amendment because the Kassebaum amendment, as you well know, has to do with airplane manufacturers' liability, a totally unrelated subject. Are you now suggesting that this matter…
There is no question that it is a controversial amendment. But it has to do with the fact that the Supreme Court in one fell swoop the other day totally eliminated the obligation and liabilities of accountants, lawyers, and all those who…
I am prepared to extend the statute retroactively to make the same law that is operable at the present time, no limitations, no changes, just extend it retroactively. We have the right under the court's decisions to extend the statute…





