It seems to me a rather interesting dichotomy that we hope to address in this Federal legislation. It is imperative, it seems to me, based on what we have heard in the committee, in the committee of the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Hyde], to really provide a national standard for those goods that are sold in interstate commerce, and indeed over 70 percent of the goods that are manufactured in this country are sold in interstate commerce. And so it behooves us in the Congress to set those Federal standards, and that is exactly what we propose to do in this particular piece of legislation, and I would urge that my colleagues do likewise.
Hon. Michael G. Oxley: “It seems to me a rather interesting dichotomy that we hope to address in this Federal legislation. It is imperative, it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for federal standards in product liability legislation.
Share
More from Hon. Michael G. Oxley
I never thought a debate on GSE reform would be so emotional, and it has been a long day and a very productive day and a good debate. Let me, first of all, say to my friend from Massachusetts, who worked very well with us in committee on…
I object, and I withdraw my unanimous consent request. Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Tiahrt).
In adopting this provision, it is our intention that the regulatory agencies utilize section 702 with care and precision. Specifically, it is not intended to be used routinely in corporate applications, notices or requests to impose…
just in conclusion, I thank the gentleman from Pennsylvania for his kind words, and all the members on the committee who worked so hard on this, particularly Mr. Kanjorski and Mr. Frank on that side, and many, many others. Mr. Speaker…





