Let me point out, I pointed out in my response about that letter; I referenced the fact that Chairman Bliley, Chairman Shuster, and I sent a letter to the gentleman from California in my remarks and recognize that they have a job to do as well, and they recognize that the program as it is now constituted is simply not working. And so they said to us, ``Look, you get your act together, get a good bill passed, and we will reconsider the kind of money that will be available in the Superfund Program.'' I think that is entirely, entirely reasonable. As a matter of fact, the bill that the gentleman from Michigan referred to we all worked very hard on, did not pass.
Hon. Michael G. Oxley: “Let me point out, I pointed out in my response about that letter; I referenced the fact that Chairman Bliley, Chairman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Superfund Program and the need for legislative improvement.
Share
More from Hon. Michael G. Oxley
I can't match the eloquence of the gentleman from Massachusetts, so I yield back
I would echo that. And I am glad we changed the rules, by the way, that one can mention that body instead of referring to it as, quote, the other body. In any event, this is meaningful legislation that we indeed want to pursue in the other…
I look forward to clarifying this language with the help of the gentlewoman from Ohio.
It occurred to me as I was listening to my friend from California, we could go back to the old days of giving out toasters for deposits. I would say that the system we have now, I have not heard of toaster promotion for a long time…





