Clearly the Military Construction, Army National Guard account is a project that plans and designs an aviation support facility at the Fort Stewart/Hunter Army airfield in Georgia, which I might add I have landed at. The amount listed in the report is $1,158,000; however, the amount actually required for the project is $1,580,000. Unfortunately, an error was made in the report that we plan to rectify as this legislation moves forward. The gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Olver), the ranking member of the subcommittee, agrees this correction is necessary.
David Hobson: “Clearly the Military Construction, Army National Guard account is a project that plans and designs an aviation support…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing funding discrepancies for a military construction project in Georgia.
Share
More from David Hobson
I don't think they want a new rule. I think the point is they don't want to go back to Rules again to bring the supplemental material back into the bill at the later date, and that is basically the earmark provision of the bill.
I have seen the pictures that you have given me, and I certainly understand the problem there in Florida. We will try to work with you every way we can. Because I have seen it. It has fallen in, and it has got to be fixed.
In reply, yes, we will make that request. And should the subcommittee find the DOE's response unacceptable or not receive a response by the deadline stipulated, I commit to working in conference to direct the DOE to support university…
Thank you. I appreciate working with you, too, sir. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move that the Committee do now rise. The motion was agreed to. Accordingly, the Committee rose; and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr…





