I have not agreed totally with my ranking member, and I understand the chairman's point of order, but we have carried this in our bill for a number of years. We think it has been very productive to carry this in our bill. As far as I know, in the past it has not been challenged and to do so now I think sends the wrong messages. But I understand the Chairman's feeling that this is legislating on appropriation bills. I think sometimes that may be necessary. Maybe we ought to figure out a better way to work with him.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a provision in an appropriations bill during a House debate.
Share
More from David Hobson
on behalf of Senator DeWine and myself, I rise today to recognize this morning's honored guest chaplain, Dr. Paul Dixon, who serves as the president of Cedarville University, which is located in Greene County, Ohio, in my district, and in…
I am pleased to enter into a discussion with the chairman of the Committee on Resources, and would tell him that I understand the need for this important project, and I will commit to my friend from California to do the best I can to…
The Federal Government signed an agreement with the utility companies to dispose of this nuclear material by 1998 at the Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada. Unfortunately, Yucca Mountain is not scheduled to open until 2010.
we have before us today a reasonable and balanced bill that provides the final push for an idea that my colleague, the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Sawyer), and myself have been working on for 7 years: The simplification of paperwork…





