[T]he parents of children covered by the Citizenship Order would be well advised to file promptly class-action suits.

No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates.

Casting aside longstanding precedent, the Court invents a constitutional right to avoid exposure to ‘subtle’ themes ‘contrary to the religious principles’ that parents wish to instill in their children.

the majority invited open defiance of the Constitution

Today, the Court abdicates its vital role in that effort. With the stroke of a pen, the President has made a ‘solemn mockery’ of our Constitution.

a travesty for the rule of law

the Government has made clear in word and deed that it feels itself unconstrained by law, free to deport anyone anywhere without notice or an opportunity to be heard.

The Government does not ask for complete stays of the injunctions, as it ordinarily does before this Court. Why? The answer is obvious: To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an…

Schools may instead censor their curricula, stripping material that risks generating religious objections.

To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an impossible task

the ruling was a travesty for the rule of the law and an open invitation to bypass the constitution.

I warned of the 'new legal regime' created by the Court’s decision.