The intent of the founders were set forth in the Constitution.
It must be applied, as is all the court's existing precedents that have not been rejected by the court.
What choices do you think about in terms of what Congress will do, what politicians will do.
No, that's not the role of the courts. The role of the courts is to interpret the law as Congress writes it.
I do not believe that judges should use their personal feelings, beliefs, or value systems or make their--to influence their outcomes.
I will not use foreign law to interpret the Constitution or American statutes.
intrusions by a judge upon the functions of other branches of government should only be done as a last resort and limitedly.
Work at explaining to the--to the public what the process is.
The issue was whether or not employees who were a member of a disparately impacted group had a right under existing precedent to bring a law...
Our system of election financing permits extensive private, including corporate financing of candidate's campaigns, raising again and again ...
No, sir. Absolutely not.