This is the absolute wrong time for the Supreme Court to be sending a signal that would allow more discrimination rather than protection for gay rights.

Thus, Glossip is entitled to a new trial.

the prosecution violated its constitutional obligation to correct false testimony.

the prosecution violated its constitutional obligation to correct false testimony.

Thus, Glossip is entitled to a new trial.

Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts, I don’t see how it is possible.

Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception, that the Constitution and its reading are just political acts? I don't see how it is possible.

This case is a disaster for the rule of law and a grave disservice to women in Texas, who have a right to control their own bodies. I will not stand by silently as a state continues to nullify this constitutional guarantee. I dissent.

What`s the difference between this and telling employers, where sparks are flying in the workplace, your workers have to be -- wear a mask?

This choice to shrink from Texas challenge to federal supremacy will have far-reaching repercussions. I doubt the court, let alone the country, is prepared for them. The court should have put an end to this madness months ago.

The court should have put an end to this madness months ago before the ban first went into effect. It failed to do so then. It fails again today. The court just betrays not only the citizens of Texas but also our constitutional system of…

This looks like nullification. We have a constitutionally protected right to abortion in this country, this state says, we`ve come up with this clever way to nullify it, and this court is going to OK it.