A key concern that the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Udall) and I share is continuing the protection of the so-called 202 lands. My amendment says that the 202 areas must continue to be managed at least as strictly as they are now. My concern about going further, as the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Udall) does, is that it will destroy a very delicate and very carefully crafted agreement, and we will get nothing.
Discussing the protection of 202 lands during a floor debate.
Share
More from Sherwood Boehlert
What does ``development of physical facilities'' mean then in the author's mind?
Because you've got sort of inertia on Capitol Hill. You've got some people still thinking the same old way. Some people refusing to be confused by the facts. Not theories. Not opinions. The facts.
Reclaiming my time, reading from the language of the amendment. ``The Administrator shall establish and carry out a pilot program to make grants to minority institutions for the development of physical facilities and infrastructure to be…
For the reasons just cited by my distinguished colleague from Ohio, I remain an enthusiastic supporter of a robust aeronautics program at NASA. It provides so much benefit to the U.S. economy. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to yield 1 minute to…
Other voices in this conversation
