a key concern that the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Udall) and I share is continuing the protection of the so-called 202 lands. My amendment says that the 202 areas must continue to be managed at least as strictly as they are now. My concern about going further, as the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Udall) does, is that it will destroy a very delicate and very carefully crafted agreement, and we will get nothing.
Discussing the protection of 202 lands during a floor debate.
Share
More from Sherwood Boehlert
What does ``development of physical facilities'' mean then in the author's mind?
As we celebrate Earth Day, it is important to reflect upon our environmental accomplishments and plan for the environmental challenges ahead. For over three decades investments in clean water infrastructure, wastewater treatment…
the examples of inequities and simply unfair and lacking-in-commonsense provisions of our existing Tax Code are just too numerous to mention. I wish I could wave a magic wand and eliminate them all overnight. This President and this…
I note the committee's strong support for parallel electric hybrid buses. I agree, we must encourage the use of low-emission technologies as a way to reduce air pollution from our Nation's bus fleet. I would like to point out that…
Other voices in this conversation
