I think the gentleman will be happy to know that we take care of his primary concerns. First of all my amendment does not deal with only after. We deal with prior to. We have made an adjustment as a result of the Dicks amendment to mine which I accepted. So if there is a substantial threat, we can do the repair work prior to. That is very important.
Discussing amendments related to addressing threats in a legislative context.
Share
More from Sherwood Boehlert
we have in this motion to recommit a textbook example of how the perfect is the enemy of the good. Personally, I support the Advanced Technology Program, although I know that many of my colleagues on this side of the aisle do not. But I…
What does ``development of physical facilities'' mean then in the author's mind?
I would propose in response to the gentlewoman that she withdraw the amendment and we work in the spirit of bipartisanship to refine it so we all clearly understand what we are talking about.
Other voices in this conversation
