I rise today to declare my pride at the inclusion of $160 million for breast cancer-related research in the fiscal year 1998 Defense appropriations bill. This figure represents a significant 42-percent increase over last year's appropriation. Breast cancer research has long been an important priority of mine, as well as of my colleagues in the Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues. I am pleased our voices are being heard. The Department of Defense's peer-reviewed breast cancer research program is well known, both for its vital work in fighting this disease and its innovative and efficient use of resources. In fact, over 90 percent of program funds go directly to research grants. The emphasis on research is crucial, for while there have been several significant advances we still know relatively little about preventing breast cancer, and treatment options are few. Unfortunately, American women still face a one in eight chance of developing breast cancer during their lifetime. With nearly 200,000 cases diagnosed last year, breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women. In fact, it accounts for one of every three cancer diagnoses among women. In order to make the most of recent discoveries, and to improve the lives of future generations of women, we need measures like this that invest in breast cancer research. I am also happy to note that this bill has increased funding for HIV and prostate cancer research as well.
Sean Patrick Maloney: “I rise today to declare my pride at the inclusion of $160 million for breast cancer-related research in the fiscal year…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding for breast cancer research in the fiscal year 1998 Defense appropriations bill.
Share
More from Sean Patrick Maloney
I think effective American leadership can in fact rally the world against significant threats, as we have seen with respect to both Ukraine and China.
for the 13 billion bucks you guys were requesting, we got a hell of a lot for the taxpayers' dollars to the 11 statutory missions you perform.
I support the consideration of precise and enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), removing the term 'recommendation' from the lexicon in the standards for emerging contaminants and forever chemicals.
But make no mistake, there is now a $1 billion price on the head of every dual national and Western tourist...





