no one talks a better game than the Department of Homeland Security. But beyond the bluster, there is reason to feel deeply insecure about this administration's efforts to protect America. Although we hear a great deal about the war on terror, no competent general in any war would leave his home defenses with so many holes. Every line of critical homeland defense is underfunded and unprepared for an attack on American soil, and we are going in the wrong direction. Unbelievably, the administration essentially froze homeland security spending in 2003. The President's budget cut port security grant funding by 63 percent, cut first responder funding within the Department of Homeland Security by 15 percent, and provided no dedicated funding whatsoever for rail security or protecting chemical plants and nuclear power plants. My question is, when is this administration going to get serious about funding homeland security.
Sean Patrick Maloney: “no one talks a better game than the Department of Homeland Security. But beyond the bluster, there is reason to feel…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the administration's funding cuts to homeland security during a House floor speech.
Share
More from Sean Patrick Maloney
I think that we need to put all of our efforts toward helping the Iranian people to see what they've been fighting for for more than a century.
The growth of the digital asset industry has centered on innovation, transparency, and security--and I believe in fostering that innovation here in the United States.
I think right now my goal is to utilize the economists and the experts in the CFTC to engage with the private market to support innovation.
Our goal cannot just be to keep rural communities alive--we need to do the work to ensure that those communities are thriving and can succeed in a 21st century economy, and that's what I hope to get out of this hearing today.





