I rise in support of the supplemental but in opposition to the rule for the Shays-Meehan bill. What we needed was a fair fight, an up or down vote on Shays-Meehan, a quality, balanced, bipartisan campaign finance bill that a majority of this House has supported twice and that has already passed the Senate. We needed a fair rule. But what did we get? We got a mine field. We got Shays-Meehan shattered, fragmented, broken into 14 separate parts that needs to be reassembled in separate votes into that fragile flower called consensus. After the mine field, more poison pill votes. Apparently the leadership felt they could not win on the merits so they had to manipulate the process to shortchange the American people once again. Campaign finance reform is the litmus test for real change in this Congress. And the real litmus test for supporters of campaign finance reform is voting against this destructive, unfair, undemocratic rule.
Sean Patrick Maloney: “I rise in support of the supplemental but in opposition to the rule for the Shays-Meehan bill. What we needed was a fair…”
On the recordJuly 12, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the rule for the Shays-Meehan campaign finance bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Sean Patrick Maloney
Jun 22, 2022
I am concerned that this industry does not adequately expose its risks and volatility as it tries to lure in a new and unsuspecting money.
Apr 26, 2022
for the 13 billion bucks you guys were requesting, we got a hell of a lot for the taxpayers' dollars to the 11 statutory missions you perform.
Sep 9, 2021
I’m glad to see the president strengthening the requirements. I think it’s past due. And I think it’s our job to make sure that people understand that the Republican Party has been reckless and irresponsible on the pandemic.





