Mexico City is nothing more than an international form of gag rule on providers, severely restricting the way legitimate helpful organizations use their own funds. Restricting use of money will not decrease the number of abortions performed in developing countries. Rather, lack of access to family planning facilities will likely lead to an increase in unwanted pregnancies and therefore more abortions. We have seen in our own country how simple family planning education can work to solve problems of overpopulation and reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies. Again, family planning means education. It is not a means of doling out abortion dollars across the globe. This gag rule has no place in this debate, and I urge my colleagues not to give in to these tactics. I urge a vote against the Smith bill.
Sean Patrick Maloney: “Mexico City is nothing more than an international form of gag rule on providers, severely restricting the way legitimate…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Mexico City policy and advocating for family planning during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Sean Patrick Maloney
Let me also take this opportunity... to appeal for greater bipartisan cooperation on Iran.
I think right now my goal is to utilize the economists and the experts in the CFTC to engage with the private market to support innovation.
Our goal cannot just be to keep rural communities alive--we need to do the work to ensure that those communities are thriving and can succeed in a 21st century economy, and that's what I hope to get out of this hearing today.
I was thinking about my family when I spoke on the floor today when I presided for the second time over the passage of the Equality Act. Two years ago, when we did these eight Republicans supported it. Today, it was three. They`re going…





