I appreciate that. I just want to state clearly that the amendment itself embraces flexibility. It understands that if there are changes in time that are requiring the list to be adjusted, we would have the academy adjust that so that the flexibility is there recognizing that if, in the course of time, the change needs to be made, if we need to further extend the list, so be it. But the flexibility is contained in the amendment. With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
On the recordJuly 12, 2012
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Paul Tonko
Mar 29, 2023
I choose not to speak in opposition to the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Sep 20, 2024
I thank the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) for yielding. The transportation sector is the largest source of climate pollution in our United States and also a major emitter of other dangerous pollutants. It should not surprise…
Mar 29, 2023
I will start by saying I have good news for my colleagues across the aisle. The Department of Energy isn't banning gas stoves. It doesn't even have the authority to ban gas stoves. This amendment, like this whole bill, is political…
Dec 12, 2023
During rollcall vote No. 710 on the previous question on H. Res. 922, I mistakenly recorded my vote as ``yea'' when I should have voted ``nay.''





