On the recordFebruary 6, 2025
Mr. Speaker, we appreciate Mr. Foster's participation this evening and for his work as a scientist, engaging all of us in the importance of having unadulterated science policy and science research done so that we can move forward with a pure truth and science-based and evidence-based discussion. Mr. Speaker, so scientific integrity, or the lack thereof, has its consequences. Once again, we are witnessing a troubling pattern: Science and public health experts are being sidelined. The decision to purge members of the EPA's Science Advisory Board and Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee is nothing short of a setback for scientific integrity. These panels exist to provide statutorily required, independent, science-driven public health reviews, not to serve as a revolving door for political agendas. History has shown us what happens when we weaken those advisory bodies by replacing well-respected academic experts with representatives that are financially tied to regulated industries. The last time a similar purge took place, key air quality standards were delayed and polluters were given a pass. And who suffers? Children with asthma, seniors with heart and lung disease, and communities already burdened by pollution suffer. Let's be clear: Sound science is the foundation upon which we built public health protections. Just last year, based on expert recommendations from the CASAC, EPA strengthened fine particle pollution standards for the first time in over a decade.…





