Mr. Speaker, the Democrats want to lecture us on the environment, but let's take a look at their record. For 4 years in the last administration, they pushed policies that were more about ideology than results. They drove up costs. They added layers of bureaucracy. They made it harder for States and communities to actually manage real environmental challenges. They created a system that punishes States for factors outside of their control. It discourages proactive solutions and slows down projects with duplicative and unnecessary reviews. That is not environmental leadership. It is regulatory overreach. Now, under President Trump's leadership, we are taking a more practical approach. We are focusing on policies that actually work by supporting States, encouraging prevention, and cutting through red tape that has held back progress for years. The difference is very clear. Democrats defend a system that is more complicated, more expensive, and less effective. Republicans are focused on making environmental policy more predictable, more efficient, and more grounded in reality. Mr. Speaker, that is exactly what the legislation in this rule does. It makes clear that States shouldn't be penalized for emissions they can't control, including pollution from foreign countries and wildfire smoke drifting across our borders.
Nick Langworthy: “Mr. Speaker, the Democrats want to lecture us on the environment, but let's take a look at their record. For 4 years in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental policy and regulatory approaches during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Nick Langworthy
It's just creating more inaction and more reasons for people to have a bad taste in their mouth about the U.S. House.
I have, I guess, more questions than answers about this fund, in general, as to how it would be executed, how it would be put together.
Mr. Speaker, I want to remind my friends on the other side of the aisle that the Supreme Court heard arguments on November 5 on this very issue of whether the Trump administration has the authority to impose the tariffs under the debate…
I encourage my colleagues to support the SHARE IT Act, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Langworthy) that the House suspend the rules…





