under this amendment, not only are the DARE funds guaranteed but the Governors' fundings are safeguarded by the fact that they will stand alone in a manner which will allow them to deal with the Appropriations Committee's criticism. This program has been criticized for not being accountable. Mr. Chairman, as the head of the subcommittee with jurisdiction, we were able to get accountability from all components of the program except the Governors' programs. They were not operating in a way which would allow us to get the kind of accountability. Now they will be required to be operated in such a way which would guarantee to the Appropriations Committee and everybody else that this is not a pork barrel for Governors. It is not pork. It deserves to be under the same kind of scrutiny. This guarantees that they have to meet those requirements and enhances the possibility of their getting the necessary appropriations. The DARE money comes off the top, but the $90 million also is in better shape as a result of this amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing accountability measures for DARE and Governors' funding during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Major Owens
You have not even mentioned health care, the fact that after they get off AFDC, they cannot get Medicaid, they do not have health care.
You estimate, according to your statistics, maybe as many as two-fifths of the people on welfare could get off with just some enhancement of the job training and education program.
I congratulate my distinguished colleague from California for that fine piece of legislation, and I would like to become a cosponsor. I think it certainly ought to be a component of any welfare reform legislation. Mr. Speaker, I have a…
I rise in support of the Unsoeld amendment. I do not want to be redundant, but this is not an amendment about values, this is an amendment about micromanaging and local control. Monstrous, monumental micromanagement would have to take…





