I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts for yielding this time. Mr. Speaker, the Republicans continue to demonstrate just how far out of whack their priorities are. Here we are in the 11th day of the Republican government shutdown--a shutdown for the sole purpose of denying health care to millions of Americans. I guess America shouldn't be surprised. After all, last month, the majority pushed through severe, painful cuts to the nutrition programs for hungry families. We are now moving toward going to a conference with the Senate on these damaging cuts. By insisting on these nearly $40 billion in cuts, the Republicans have made clear where they stand, even clearer where they don't stand. Now, understand. I know that the gentlelady talks about the truly needy, but what she is really saying is that the somewhat needy, the sorta needy, the kinda needy, the ``needy'' needy need not apply because they are not in need of food stamps. When you look at the number of $20 billion, it was the original number, which is a block number, and it was without consequences to who they would hurt. When that failed, they said, What would work? Let's use $40 billion. Yes, $40 billion will do it--a nice, neat number without any consequences to who might get hurt. Someone had a bright idea on the other side and said that this number will work, and it was without a rationale for the number and without any understanding of what the impact would be. So we know where they stand.…
Joe Crowley: “I thank the gentleman from Massachusetts for yielding this time. Mr. Speaker, the Republicans continue to demonstrate…”
Share
More from Joe Crowley
On July 19, 2018, I was absent for recorded votes No. 363 and No. 364. I would have voted as follows if I had been present: On rollcall No. 363, I would have voted ``no''; on rollcall No. 364, I would have voted ``yes.'' The SPEAKER pro…
One more further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York will state his parliamentary inquiry.
I would hope that, for the record, our witnesses would tell us what we can do to illustrate to the entire Muslim world what China is doing not only to the Uighurs but in support of the Burmese regime.
On May 10, 2018, I was absent for recorded votes 178, 179, and 180. Had I been present, on rollcall 178 I would have voted ``yes'', on rollcall 179 I would have voted ``no''; and on rollcall 180 I would have voted ``no''. PERSONAL…





