the House version of the U.S. Global AIDS Act contains language suggesting that only family planning programs compliant with the global gag rule will be eligible to receive PEPFAR funds to provide HIV education, counseling, and testing. I believe that this would be a new restriction. No such requirement exists in current law or policy. And I believe if we are serious about preventing the most new infections, we need to put aside our political differences on the merits of the global gag rule and ensure that the very best in the field have the support of the U.S. to do what they need to do, and that is prevent the spreading of HIV/AIDS.
Joe Crowley: “the House version of the U.S. Global AIDS Act contains language suggesting that only family planning programs compliant…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the U.S. Global AIDS Act and the global gag rule.
Share
More from Joe Crowley
If the government of Burma, Myanmar, will not protect the people of north Rakhine State, then maybe that State should be part of another nation or independent.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 223, nays 182, not voting 23, as follows: [Roll No. 172] YEAS--223 Abraham Aderholt Allen Amodei Arrington…
I am asking on the underlying resolution before you, is it a privileged resolution? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair announced that the resolution qualified as privileged.
By direction of the Democratic Caucus, I offer a privileged resolution and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 833 Resolved, That the following named Members be and are hereby elected to…





