Political Quotes

Joe Crowley: Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this rule, because hidden deep in this bill is language that indeed will…

On the recordMarch 2, 2011
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this rule, because hidden deep in this bill is language that indeed will increase income taxes on middle class American families by thousands of dollars a year. My Republican colleagues claim the bill is not a tax increase on the middle class. They argue that Grover Norquist says it's not a tax increase. They say Democrats have, and I quote, ``decided to dance the Washington two-step,'' claiming this bill contains a new income tax on working families. In hearing all that, I have one simple question: If the Republican plan is not that of a massive, new income tax increase, then why did the Republican majority refuse to allow a vote on the amendment which I offered? My amendment simply said that no section of this bill would take effect if it raised taxes on any American family of four earning less than $110,250 a year. That's all it said. It just makes it clear you can't raise taxes on the middle class. That's all it said. It is a straightforward and simple amendment.
Said by
Joe Crowley
Democratic · New York
Source
govinfo.gov
Mar 2, 2011

Editor's note · Context

Crowley opposes a bill he claims will increase taxes on middle-class families.

Share

More from Joe Crowley

May 8, 2018

Further parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New York will state his parliamentary inquiry.

govinfo.gov
Aug 2, 2020

We would not have to wait for a determination. It would not be just aimed at one or two individuals, but would affect the regime.

congress.gov
Sep 28, 2021

I do think that a $2 trillion or $2.5 trillion or whatever that number is going to be, it is going to be transformative, tremendously transformative.

msnbc.com
May 10, 2018

On May 10, 2018, I was absent for recorded votes 178, 179, and 180. Had I been present, on rollcall 178 I would have voted ``yes'', on rollcall 179 I would have voted ``no''; and on rollcall 180 I would have voted ``no''. PERSONAL…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation