as a freshman congressman representing the financial capital of the U.S., I rise today in support of H.R. 10. Madam Chairman, currently our financial services industry is governed by outdated laws and regulations which are costly and inconvenient to consumers and which have put the industry at a competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace. Modernizing these outdated laws is needed to bring about the real benefits available to the millions of Americans who use financial services and to allow U.S. financial firms to remain the predominant force in global markets. Madam Chairman, this legislation strikes a critical, unprecedented balance by providing a new financial services infrastructure aimed at keeping the United States competitive in the global marketplace while ensuring quality services and protections for consumers and communities. Madam Chairman, I know many of my colleagues are disappointed that stronger privacy language was not included to protect the confidential medical and financial information of consumers. I understand and agree with their disappointment that the Committee on Rules did not rule in order many Democratic-sponsored amendments to protect consumers. The underlying Banking Committee version is a good bill. Let us not lose sight of what we are trying to do. Madam Chairman, we simply cannot afford to wait any longer to create a modern framework for U.S. financial corporations and our Nation's capital markets.
Joe Crowley: “as a freshman congressman representing the financial capital of the U.S., I rise today in support of H.R. 10. Madam…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting H.R. 10 to modernize financial services laws during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Joe Crowley
It's so obnoxious, so obscene to see him actually pushing the Justice Department to go after his political enemies.
I am asking on the underlying resolution before you, is it a privileged resolution? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair announced that the resolution qualified as privileged.
Could the House consider this motion immediately? The gentleman from New York requests: Can the House consider this motion immediately? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The House will first consider the pending motion to table.
We were so close, so close. Some Republicans were finally willing to work with Democrats on a bipartisan way forward to give certainty to Dreamers, young people who want to be able to work and go to school here free from fear. We needed…





