I respectfully and reluctantly rise in opposition to the amendment offered by my friend and colleague, the gentleman from California (Mr. Sherman), whom I respect. As a member of the Committee on Financial Services, I have been at numerous hearings that have been held on the issue of OCC preemption. What the OCC did in promulgating these regulations is well within, in my opinion, their scope as a regulator of national banks. But I believe the issue is bigger than that of the powers of national versus State chartered banks or the presumed powers of the OCC. The real question here deals with ensuring the greatest protections of all American banking consumers with respect to stopping abusive lending practices. And that is why I salute the OCC's actions. Our constituents have no idea where their bank is chartered, and they really do not care. But they really do care about protecting their money and their investments and keeping the access to capital free flowing. This action by the OCC will allow that to happen.
Joe Crowley: “I respectfully and reluctantly rise in opposition to the amendment offered by my friend and colleague, the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to OCC regulations and consumer protections in banking.
Share
More from Joe Crowley
It's so obnoxious, so obscene to see him actually pushing the Justice Department to go after his political enemies.
On May 10, 2018, I was absent for recorded votes 178, 179, and 180. Had I been present, on rollcall 178 I would have voted ``yes'', on rollcall 179 I would have voted ``no''; and on rollcall 180 I would have voted ``no''. PERSONAL…
Is this motion privileged? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California has offered a motion to table the question of privilege.
By direction of the Democratic Caucus, I offer a privileged resolution and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: H. Res. 816 Resolved, That the following named Member be and is hereby elected to…





