The President told us why he fired Mr. Comey, and it wasn't for any of the things mentioned in the report. It was because of the Russia investigation.
Jerry Nadler
The Public Record
Jerrold Lewis Nadler is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for New York's 10th congressional district since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously represented New York's 8th congressional district from 1992 to 2013. Throughout his tenure, Nadler has been known for his work on issues related to civil rights, judiciary matters, and government oversight. He has played a significant role in various legislative efforts and has been an outspoken advocate for progressive policies.
In the days since you released your report, Mr. Inspector General, I have been struck by the total disconnect between the Republican party line and your actual findings.
These children are not animals. They are not bargaining chips. They are not leverage to help President Trump build his wall.
The United States should be better than this. We should not put children in cages.
Peter Strzok certainly knew about the Russia investigation before the election.
Although you found reason to question Mr. Comey's judgment, you found no evidence that his actions were, quote, 'the result of bias or an effort to influence the election.' Is that correct?
This new policy is, in essence, as the ACLU warns, 'a door-to-door government inquiry as to the citizenship status of every member of every household in the United States.'
As one of our witnesses, Dr. Steve Murdock, will explain, without thorough testing and analysis, the effects of adding a citizenship question are unknown and open to an array of dangerous consequences.
Yet, in service of a narrow political agenda, the Trump administration believes it knows better.
To date, at least six lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration challenging the legality of adding this query to the 2020 census questionnaire.
I am prepared to close if the other side is, and I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, in spite of the good intentions of this bill, I believe the restrictions in the incentive system it would create with respect to…
I have one further speaker, and then I will be prepared to close. Mr. Speaker, I yield 4 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee), the distinguished ranking member of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security…
Although 11 years have passed since then, many of the reasons for supporting that legislation in 2007 remain valid today.
Put more bluntly, OPEC is a cartel whose members deliberately collude to limit crude oil production as a means of fixing prices.
This amendment makes several technical revisions to clarify that the bill does not apply to consummated mergers and other transactions. While this change marginally addresses one concern with the bill, it does nothing to change the most…
We will not be able to arrest and incarcerate our way out of a drug abuse problem that has many causes.
We must not make that same mistake with any of the drugs classified as opioids, and we must reverse and rectify the mistakes we have made in other drugs such as crack.
That approach was wrong and continues to be wrong, disparately impacting African-American communities while fueling mass incarceration.
It is impossible not to see the contrasts without Congress' response to the opioid crisis in comparison to their responses to some other drugs, particularly crack cocaine.
I welcome today's hearing as an opportunity to explore ways in which we can best address the crisis of opioid abuse in our country.
Everybody here; Mr. Szoka, Professor Waldman, Mr. Chavern has said there is no evidence that they have seen that Facebook intentionally discriminated against Conservative views.
I am not sure that it is this Congress's or this committee's role to say that Facebook has to have X-amount of voices from the Conservative side and X-amount of voices from the Liberal side.





