They will do anything, this five-member majority of the Supreme Court, to enforce these arbitration clauses because it protects Big Business.

I think that's not what this body should be doing. This body should be protecting these women and other women like them.

This is overwhelmingly bad, right? This is, as I said in my opening remarks, I think the worst possible system one could design to deal with a problem of this nature.

This is not what they intended. This is what a Supreme Court intent on protecting corporations intended beginning in the 1990s.

As long as I am here, I will continue to protect and defend it.

There is no question that SB 8 is blatantly unconstitutional, and that the Texas legislature intentionally ignore decades of legal precedent in enacting the law.

These efforts have culminated in SB 8 and they have had one goal, to challenge and eventually to overturn the constitutionally-protected right to abortion.

Sixty-five days, that is how long women in Texas have been effectively stripped of their constitutional right to abortion.

I would think that that would be a superior route because it is proven impossible, despite the STOCK Act and various other acts that we have passed, to enforce the law.

I would like to see this pass as fast as possible. I have wanted to see it pass as fast as possible for at least a dozen years.

I would just urge the Department of Justice, as it has been doing under your leadership to continue to do all that's possible to defend and protect the integrity of the right to vote.

if he became chair of Judiciary, he would give us a real hearing, and he delivered on his promise in 2020.