Jerry Nadler

If you guys would have come out with a statement from Washington and said we condemn this beating to Mr. Borgen's son, we condemn anti-Semitism, we condemn this act, maybe Mr. Bragg would have taken this case a little more seriously.

It is particularly disgraceful that they would use this pretext after doing nothing--nothing--to stop the gun violence that terrorizes our Nation.

Using this Committee to undermine that process as it unfolds is cynical, unethical and, given the violence unleashed on the Capitol by the former President, just plain dangerous.

They are using their public offices and the resources of this committee to protect their political patron, Donald Trump. It is an outrageous abuse of power.

We are here today in Lower Manhattan for one reason and one reason only. The Chair is doing the bidding of Donald Trump.

Mr. Chair, I ask unanimous consent introduced for the record on April 12, 2023, an article from Politifact that states, quote, We reviewed Bragg's campaign record and found that although he often cited his prior prosecutorial experience…

I thank Ranking Member Grijalva for yielding and for his leadership in opposition to the polluters over people act. I must say that the concern of the gentleman from New Jersey--we just heard about ocean animals--is touching, considering…

Our First Amendment protections are precious. There is a reason the Framers enshrined the freedoms of religion, speech, the press, and the right to peaceably assemble and petition the Government for redress as the First Amendment to the…

Gun violence continues to take the lives of more than 100 Americans every day.

The dangerous REINS Act, which we've discussed.

How Congress would ever find the time to go over thousands and thousands of detailed regulations.

I find it telling that we are using the first meeting of this Subcommittee not to discuss how we can better serve the needs of all Americans, but, rather, how we can remove public health and safety safeguards for the sake of higher company…

How do Republicans plan to advance their extreme agenda protecting profits over people? By trotting out the same old tired anti-health and safety legislation they have tried year after year whenever they control the House.

I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in opposition to this resolution, and I want to associate myself with the remarks of the chairman and the ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee. For all those reasons, we cannot withdraw…

Unfortunately, there are also many documented instances of the PRC using outright illegal means to access U.S. technology, including cyber espionage and trade secret theft.

Today, we see a government in China that has become increasingly authoritarian, using a vast array of technology to track its citizens.

I voted against China's entry into the WTO because I had serious concerns about the impact that globalization would have on American workers.

Some Republicans would prefer different actions. Some Republicans want to incarcerate our way out of this problem, but we know from past experience that this simply does not work.

The seriousness of the fentanyl crisis cannot be denied.

No. We have already been blocked.

We would argue that so long as we have not gone over the total budget for the year, they ought to allow us to spend these funds as we see fit.

If that is the case, we do have a problem with the division of funds.

The House Judiciary Committee has historically been one of the most active committees in the House.

I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, this resolution lists many Communist dictators, but it doesn't list any of the capitalist dictators--from Hitler to Mussolini to Franco to Salazar to Peron, and so many more, because the…

I suspect this hearing is also intended to distract from the fact that Republicans have failed to pass any meaningful legislation in their first month in the majority.