That is a 50-percent change. That is not a small change, it is a huge assumption.
I was simply suggesting that none of this makes any sense until you have determined that someone is an enemy combatant.
However narrow or broad the basket, you have to answer that question first--Are you an enemy combatant?--and have the pr...
Either this person is an enemy combatant, or he is not.
Isn't it the case that if Russia or China or someone were doing what Mr. Cole posits, that we would condemn that out of ...
My point was that however narrow or broad the basket, and I am not suggesting broadening it, you have to answer that que...
But who can determine that under what standards, and what precedents do we have?
I don't understand how a unilateral determination by an executive branch official without any judicial involvement can b...
We need due process, but not judicial process.
It seems to me that there is one further thing that any good immigration reform should do, and that is to eliminate unju...
There is legislation called the United American Families Act which would establish an equivalency so that... we will not...