So in other words, one has to assume that if X percent of people would have been executed but for DNA evidence where DNA evidence is available, then probably a similar amount of people who are innocent are executed where the DNA evidence is not available.
Nadler discusses the implications of DNA evidence on wrongful executions.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
A few minutes ago, four Republicans saved this House from disgrace. We almost passed a resolution to remove a Member from committees for the sin of exercising free speech. Charlie Kirk was a prominent figure, beloved by many, disliked…
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…
Other voices in this conversation
