Yes, but the NSF research at $246 million allocated for this, earmarked for this program, so it comes from this earmark and from nowhere else, and therefore the figures that I just gave, which is that this earmark out of that total appropriation is an earmark of $1 million greater than last year; what we are proposing here is to reduce that by $10 million, a reduction of $9 million from last year, 3.6 percent of one of the 13 Federal Antarctic programs in order to provide level funding from last year for people, for housing for people with AIDS so we do not throw people out on the street, and I think the choice should be clear, and I thank the gentleman again for yielding.
Jerry Nadler: “Yes, but the NSF research at $246 million allocated for this, earmarked for this program, so it comes from this earmark…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding allocations for NSF research and housing for people with AIDS.
Share
More from Jerry Nadler
If their operations are legitimate and above-board, why is there a need for anonymity, and why don't they need warrants to come onto private property?
They rushed this cruel bill to markup in the dead of night without even understanding what they were voting on.
A few minutes ago, four Republicans saved this House from disgrace. We almost passed a resolution to remove a Member from committees for the sin of exercising free speech. Charlie Kirk was a prominent figure, beloved by many, disliked…
A nonbinding resolution—or any action that doesn't require the release of the Epstein files—is nothing more than a political smokescreen designed to shield Republicans who refuse to demand full transparency and accountability from the…





