arms sales are limited to maintaining Taiwan's defense needs. This need was recognized even by the negotiators of the United States-China Joint Communique of August 17, 1982. As John Holdridge, then-Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in August 1982: The Chinese insisted, however, that we agree to the ultimate termination of arms sales [to Taiwan]. We refused because the level of arms sales must be determined by the needs of Taiwan and we could not agree to a termination date, as the Chinese demanded, which might impair our ability to meet those needs. Furthermore, Secretary Holdrige stated: Our guiding principle is now and will continue to be that embodied in the Taiwan Relations Act: the maintenance of a self-defense capability sufficient to meet the military needs of Taiwan, but with the understanding that China's maintenance of a peaceful approach to the Taiwan question will permit gradual reductions in arms sales. There are in effect two primary standards to be considered: First, Taiwan's defensive needs; and second, China's intentions towards Taiwan.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and the principles guiding these sales.
Share
More from Herbert Pell
this morning's news brought word of a horrible tragedy in the Middle East. A deranged Israeli settler--an American immigrant, wearing an Israeli military uniform--opened fire with an automatic weapon inside the mosque at the Tomb of the…
this amendment will allow the President to continue to waive legislative restrictions against the PLO. Under the terms of the amendment, the President's authority to waive such restrictions can be renewed indefinitely for 6 month periods…
I appreciate and sympathize with the Senator's desire to streamline the Department's operations. Indeed, there is no disagreement about that goal between myself and the Senator or for that matter between the Senator and the Department…
this amendment raises an issue the committee and the Senate have already debated and decided. In committee, an amendment to eliminate funding for NED was defeated by a voice vote and then later during Senate consideration was defeated by a…





