this amendment raises an issue the committee and the Senate have already debated and decided. In committee, an amendment to eliminate funding for NED was defeated by a voice vote and then later during Senate consideration was defeated by a 74-to-23 vote. There is a reason the Senate has been so clear on this issue: Eliminating funding for the National Endowment for Democracy is the wrong thing to do. The NED has played a valuable role in promoting democracy in a number of nations where it has taken hold, where democracy thrives and where it seemed unlikely just 10 years ago. The importance of NED in this transition has been disclosed by the likes of Lech Walesa and Vaclav Havel. With its relatively small grants, the NED can have a profound impact on strengthening democratic processes. At the time of the Senate debate on the appropriations measure sometime back, there was an outpouring of support for the NED, including on the editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal and New York Times.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of funding for the National Endowment for Democracy.
Share
More from Herbert Pell
I was particularly struck at his thought of the inclusion of core courses. This is an idea that is long overdue.
one of the strongest relationships between the true democracies of this world is that which exists between the United States and the State of Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East. This friendship has its roots in the vital…
this amendment will allow the President to continue to waive legislative restrictions against the PLO. Under the terms of the amendment, the President's authority to waive such restrictions can be renewed indefinitely for 6 month periods…
I appreciate and sympathize with the Senator's desire to streamline the Department's operations. Indeed, there is no disagreement about that goal between myself and the Senator or for that matter between the Senator and the Department…





