Mr. Chairman, the independent counsel statute is an important and necessary law. It should be reauthorized. However, several issues surfaced during the time the now-expired statute was in effect which made it clear that certain basic reforms in this law are needed. Obviously, there are circumstances when a conflict of interest may exist, or at least when the appearance of a conflict may arise, and the Attorney General is placed in a difficult position to effectively investigate and prosecute another high-ranking Government official. The Watergate episode certainly highlighted the potential for such conflicts. The independent counsel law has proved a useful tool on some occasions to avoid such conflicts. However, the expired law has not completely fulfilled its promise or purpose. All too often it has not restored the public's confidence in Government or our legal system. Since its enactment in 1978, this law has resulted in 14 separate investigations but there has only been one final conviction of a named subject. These court-appointed prosecutors, who are accountable to absolutely nobody, have spent more than $61 million. Unfortunately, all too often there is little to show for their costly efforts. However, despite these obvious shortcomings, the majority has brought a bill (H.R. 811) to the floor today which would essentially reauthorize the same statute.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the need for reforms in the independent counsel statute and its reauthorization.
Share
More from Hamilton Fish
I think this is a most appropriate action for the Congress of the United States to take. This resolution gives a compelling case of the contributions of Irish-Americans to the United States throughout our history, from the very beginning…
Mr. Chairman, I rise today to strongly urge my colleagues to support the McCloskey-Gilman-Bonior-Hoyer amendment, which provides for the immediate and unilateral lifting of the arms embargo against Bosnia and Herzegovina. Let us once and…
I supported the habeas corpus provision reported by the Judiciary Committee. I think it strikes a fair balance between streamlining the process and ensuring fairness. But I also support the Derrick amendment. It is tougher than the…
As many of you know, my first contact with Ireland came in the early 1950's when I served as a vice consul of the U.S. Foreign Service in Dublin. I then returned in 1978, as the ranking minority member of the Immigration Subcommittee, to…





