I just came on the floor, and I understand that in previous discussion concerning the rule a statement was made about a vote I cast a number of years ago on similar coverage. That was in 1987, I believe, about congressional coverage. My recollection is that at that time the amendment was offered by Mr. Shaw and I voted in favor of it. It is also a matter of record that I voted for this provision, the Gekas amendment, in the Judiciary Committee bringing this bill to the full House.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses a previous vote on congressional coverage and clarifies their voting history.
Share
More from Hamilton Fish
many of us are growing increasingly concerned with two trends in Federal aid to education. The first is the creation of unfunded mandates and the second is the erosion of local control and flexibility in determining such matters as…
Mr. Chairman, the independent counsel statute is an important and necessary law. It should be reauthorized. However, several issues surfaced during the time the now-expired statute was in effect which made it clear that certain basic…
much of the debate over H.R. 6 has centered around the role of the Federal Government in education. I am a firm believer that the primary responsibility for education lies with the States. However, when the Federal Government directly…
Mr. Chairman, I rise today to strongly urge my colleagues to support the McCloskey-Gilman-Bonior-Hoyer amendment, which provides for the immediate and unilateral lifting of the arms embargo against Bosnia and Herzegovina. Let us once and…





