Such inconsistency showed timidity and confusion instead of courage and conviction, disappointing to friends and ridiculous to opponents.
De Alexander: “Such inconsistency showed timidity and confusion instead of courage and conviction, disappointing to friends and…”
Editor's note · Context
Alexander criticizes the President's inconsistency as a sign of weakness, disappointing allies and emboldening opponents.
Share
More from De Alexander
More valuable still is his exposition of the Philippine question in its bearings on American life and politics.
Shows the historical reasons for the present method, and its effect on the senate and senators, and on state and local government, with a detailed review of the arguments for and against direct election.
Referring to the fraudulent practices, he said: "No one claims, no one believes, that I had lot or part therein, or previous hint or suspicion thereof.
In accepting the Democratic nomination Cleveland had the great advantage of not being obliged to refer to anything of which he was ashamed.





