On the record
Such inconsistency showed timidity and confusion instead of courage and conviction, disappointing to friends and ridiculous to opponents.
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
Alexander criticizes the President's inconsistency as a sign of weakness, disappointing allies and emboldening opponents.
Share
More from De Alexander
He used to get angry with men simply because they voted against him on questions in which he took an interest.
He represented Republican principles and aims more fully than any man in the country, but Thurlow Weed, looking into the future through the eyes of a practical politician, disbelieved in Republican success.
Indeed, he went a step farther in the way of irreconciliation, preferring Hoffman and Tammany, he said, to "the reckless, red-radicalism which rules the present Congress....
Against these acts the Democrats vigorously protested, declaring them unconstitutional, revolutionary, and another step toward centralisation, while Republicans pointed out their necessity in the interest of a fair vote and an honest count.
Other voices in this conversation
