On the record
But Seward's principles which rarely harmonised with those of the Radicals, now became more conspicuous and sharply defined because of the tactlessness and uncompromising spirit of Lincoln's successor.
Source
gutenberg.orgBut Seward's principles which rarely harmonised with those of the Radicals, now became more conspicuous and sharply defined because of the tactlessness and uncompromising spirit of Lincoln's successor.
Alexander highlights the growing divide between Seward's principles and those of the Radicals during a turbulent political period.
Share
More from De Alexander
If Clinton was the Hampden of the colonial period, Robert Yates could well be called its Pym.
And what have I to lose by withdrawing and leaving the party unembarrassed?
The evident purpose of the United States Bank was to create, if possible, the fear of a panic.
Against these acts the Democrats vigorously protested, declaring them unconstitutional, revolutionary, and another step toward centralisation, while Republicans pointed out their necessity in the interest of a fair vote and an honest count.