Clinton argued that the governor, being charged under the Constitution with the execution of the laws, was vested with exclusive discretion as to the number of officers necessary to their execution, whereas, if left to one not responsible for such execution, too many or too few officials might be created.
De Alexander: “Clinton argued that the governor, being charged under the Constitution with the execution of the laws, was vested with…”
Editor's note · Context
Clinton's argument emphasizes the importance of the governor's discretion in appointing officials to ensure effective law execution.
Share
More from De Alexander
A keen, exhaustive and merciless criticism of the whole Philippine experiment....
Shows the historical reasons for the present method, and its effect on the senate and senators, and on state and local government, with a detailed review of the arguments for and against direct election.
An exceedingly readable volume, especially valuable in its analyses of conditions, causes, situations and results; and against his main conclusions no sane person can contend."--Boston Transcript.
Indeed, his administration admittedly ranked with the best that had adorned the State for a century, and his friends, including Independents and many Stalwarts, rallied with energy to his support.





