He thought he was a great political leader, and he might have been if he had ever been sure of himself; but he was one of the poorest judges of men, and in that way was often deceived, often misled, and often led to change his opinions....
Alexander reflects on the shortcomings of a political leader's judgment and self-awareness.
Share
More from De Alexander
More valuable still is his exposition of the Philippine question in its bearings on American life and politics.
In his text he explains the controversy so that the plain man may understand it, while in the notes he adduces the evidence that the specialist requires....
A keen, exhaustive and merciless criticism of the whole Philippine experiment....
Shows the historical reasons for the present method, and its effect on the senate and senators, and on state and local government, with a detailed review of the arguments for and against direct election.
Other voices in this conversation
