On the record
He discussed the fallacies of secession, showing that it had no grounds, or even excuse, and declaring that disunion must lead to civil war.
Source
gutenberg.orgDe Alexander: “He discussed the fallacies of secession, showing that it had no grounds, or even excuse, and declaring that disunion…”
Editor's note · Context
Alexander critiques the rationale behind secession, arguing it lacks justification and would lead to conflict.
Share
More from De Alexander
Referring to the fraudulent practices, he said: "No one claims, no one believes, that I had lot or part therein, or previous hint or suspicion thereof.
An exceedingly readable volume, especially valuable in its analyses of conditions, causes, situations and results; and against his main conclusions no sane person can contend."--Boston Transcript.
Shows the historical reasons for the present method, and its effect on the senate and senators, and on state and local government, with a detailed review of the arguments for and against direct election.
He had been an honest lawyer as well as an upright public official, and the people believed that his stubborn independence and sturdy integrity would make him a real governor, the enemy of rings and bosses, and the foe of avarice and…
Other voices in this conversation
