On the record
Less electrical than John Van Buren, he was more persuasive; less witty, he was more logical; less sarcastic, he was more candid; less denunciatory of antagonists, he was more convincing to opponents.
Source
gutenberg.orgEditor's note · Context
This passage compares two political figures, highlighting their differing styles and effectiveness in persuasion.
Share
More from De Alexander
Indeed, he went a step farther in the way of irreconciliation, preferring Hoffman and Tammany, he said, to "the reckless, red-radicalism which rules the present Congress....
Public sentiment generally sustained the Administration in such action, but many persons, including conservative Republicans, frequently questioned the right or justice of such procedure.
Thoughtful men who were not in any sense political partisans gave careful heed to his words.
And is it not needed when its taking helps us and hurts our enemy?
Other voices in this conversation
