All that we know of Yates would seem to deny his surrender of principle, or his condescension to any act of baseness, to obtain office.
De Alexander: “All that we know of Yates would seem to deny his surrender of principle, or his condescension to any act of baseness, to…”
Editor's note · Context
Alexander defends Yates' integrity, asserting that he did not compromise his principles for political gain.
Share
More from De Alexander
Shows the historical reasons for the present method, and its effect on the senate and senators, and on state and local government, with a detailed review of the arguments for and against direct election.
An exceedingly readable volume, especially valuable in its analyses of conditions, causes, situations and results; and against his main conclusions no sane person can contend."--Boston Transcript.
Referring to the fraudulent practices, he said: "No one claims, no one believes, that I had lot or part therein, or previous hint or suspicion thereof.
More valuable still is his exposition of the Philippine question in its bearings on American life and politics.





