He did not speak often, but he always answered Seymour, presenting a fine and sustained example of debate, keeping within strict rules of combat, and preserving a rational and argumentative tone, yet emphasising the differences between Hunker and Radical.
This statement illustrates the disciplined and rational approach of a speaker in a political debate, contrasting with the more emotional rhetoric of others.
Share
More from De Alexander
Enlightened and persuasive discussion of the negro problem in its present phases and aspects.
He writes of the Filipinos as he found them, and with the knack of the true investigator, has avoided falling in with the political views of any party or faction.
Indeed, his administration admittedly ranked with the best that had adorned the State for a century, and his friends, including Independents and many Stalwarts, rallied with energy to his support.
In his text he explains the controversy so that the plain man may understand it, while in the notes he adduces the evidence that the specialist requires....
Other voices in this conversation
