On the record
In vain did Hamilton combat these points, insisting that Burr was a man of extreme and irregular ambition, selfish to a degree which even excluded social affection, and decidedly profligate.
Source
gutenberg.orgIn vain did Hamilton combat these points, insisting that Burr was a man of extreme and irregular ambition, selfish to a degree which even excluded social affection, and decidedly profligate.
Here, Alexander critiques Hamilton's view of Burr, highlighting the tension between ambition and moral character.
Share
More from De Alexander
People were getting tired of bold action without achievement in the field, and every opponent of the Administration became a threnodist.
And is it not needed when its taking helps us and hurts our enemy?
Thus far Conkling's success had been as unexpected as it was dazzling.
If Clinton was the Hampden of the colonial period, Robert Yates could well be called its Pym.