On the record
As a question of principle or expediency Clinton's conduct, therefore, admits of no defence.
Source
gutenberg.orgDe Alexander: “As a question of principle or expediency Clinton's conduct, therefore, admits of no defence.”
Editor's note · Context
Alexander argues that Clinton's actions lack justification from both a principled and practical standpoint.
Share
More from De Alexander
He had been an honest lawyer as well as an upright public official, and the people believed that his stubborn independence and sturdy integrity would make him a real governor, the enemy of rings and bosses, and the foe of avarice and…
An exceedingly readable volume, especially valuable in its analyses of conditions, causes, situations and results; and against his main conclusions no sane person can contend."--Boston Transcript.
A keen, exhaustive and merciless criticism of the whole Philippine experiment....
In accepting the Democratic nomination Cleveland had the great advantage of not being obliged to refer to anything of which he was ashamed.
Other voices in this conversation
