On the record
To him an honest difference of opinion upon constitutional questions was as corrupt and reprehensible as dishonest practices in the departments at Washington.
Source
gutenberg.orgDe Alexander: “To him an honest difference of opinion upon constitutional questions was as corrupt and reprehensible as dishonest…”
Editor's note · Context
This statement emphasizes the seriousness with which differing constitutional opinions were regarded by a political figure.
Share
More from De Alexander
Indeed, his administration admittedly ranked with the best that had adorned the State for a century, and his friends, including Independents and many Stalwarts, rallied with energy to his support.
He had been an honest lawyer as well as an upright public official, and the people believed that his stubborn independence and sturdy integrity would make him a real governor, the enemy of rings and bosses, and the foe of avarice and…
He writes of the Filipinos as he found them, and with the knack of the true investigator, has avoided falling in with the political views of any party or faction.
In his text he explains the controversy so that the plain man may understand it, while in the notes he adduces the evidence that the specialist requires....
Other voices in this conversation
