Frankly, this gentleman from California is confused. I have to tell my colleagues on the other side, they cannot have it both ways. Either we are not doing the job that the people want us to do and we should fund the committees more, or we get criticized because we are funding the committees more because we are not doing the job that we are supposed to do. The gentleman from Connecticut wants us to move campaign finance reform. The gentleman from Maryland gets up and says 'the constituents want us to know what is going on.' Well, I think if anybody paid attention at all in the last election, there was a lot going on in the gentleman's party, in his national party and over at the White House, and that if we are going to write meaningful campaign reform, we ought to find out what was going on. But we are criticized because we do not rush to the floor with a solution to whatever the problem is, because we have not had a chance to examine it.
David Thomas: “Frankly, this gentleman from California is confused. I have to tell my colleagues on the other side, they cannot have it…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing criticisms regarding campaign finance reform and committee funding.
Share
More from David Thomas
The amendment will bring transparency and discipline, but not order, to this budget process. The budget resolution is supposed to provide a blueprint for Government spending and allocate dollars for appropriators to spend in particular…
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…
I think this is a very equitable and timely distribution of these funds. I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
I am going to support the bill before us, although I don't think it is perfect. I think, frankly, there needs to be some limit on building fences. I cannot imagine building a fence, a 40-foot-tall fence, all across the border. All we would…





