I want to take a couple of moments. I already mentioned my concerns about the Thompson amendment, but I have to say it is interesting that the Senator is curious as to why there are objections to this amendment. He ought to recall that the Senate has already rejected three or four amendments for the same reason, and that is, we want to send a clean bill to the President. The idea that his is being rejected because of certain things is just not the case. There is a notion here that this bill ought to be sent, right or wrong. I happen to think that he is exactly right. There is also the implication that if you do not agree with this amendment, you do not care about these things. That is not true, either. We do separate things. There are seven or eight bills now in place. The Senator says we are not going to tie the President's hands and then on the other hand says this is going to force the President to do something. We need to get it clear. I wanted to make the point that there is no evidence that people do not care about these things. They do, indeed. There is a belief that these issues ought to be separated and we ought to deal with PNTR and then deal with the other issue. We should not think this is going to cause the President to do a number of things when we already have in place at least seven laws that are not being adhered to. Those are the things on which I wanted to be clear.
David Thomas: “I want to take a couple of moments. I already mentioned my concerns about the Thompson amendment, but I have to say it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing objections to the Thompson amendment during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
I have a point of order. Beginning your statement with ``this is why it is germane'' is not addressing the germaneness question. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman must address his comments to the issue of germaneness of the motion to…
The amendment will bring transparency and discipline, but not order, to this budget process. The budget resolution is supposed to provide a blueprint for Government spending and allocate dollars for appropriators to spend in particular…
I would like to yield 20 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran), and I ask unanimous consent that he be allowed to control the 20 minutes. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from…
I ask unanimous cosent that the Committee on Foreign Relations be authorized to meet during the session of the Senate on Tuesday, September 5, 2006, at 4:15 p.m. to hold a hearing on nominations. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection…





