Mr. Speaker, there will be a number of claims made on the floor during the debate of this particular piece of legislation. The one thing I hope people keep in mind is that it is my fervent hope that the goals of the legislation are supported by all. It is always possible to argue emphasis, direction, focus, degree of emphasis. When we debated this bill repeatedly in 1996, there were some rather dramatic claims made by its opponents about dire and Draconian circumstances that would form a dark cloud over America if the legislation passed. I happen to believe one of the bright points of the Clinton administration was his willingness after repeated offers to sign the 1996 legislation. Oftentimes claims are made without the ability to determine whether or not the, if you will, experiment was going to be successful or not. I think there is no question that the general shift in emphasis from welfare to work has been a success. Has it been an unqualified success? No, but it clearly has been a success, and what we are embarking on now is an attempt to put legislation together that will focus on areas that need greater attention to maximize the opportunity to move people from poverty to productive work, from welfare to a respect for those basic, tantamount, underlying American concepts, and there is no area more important than focusing on the people who are on welfare and the needs they have to be able to assist themselves.
David Thomas: “Mr. Speaker, there will be a number of claims made on the floor during the debate of this particular piece of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the goals and implications of welfare reform legislation during a House floor debate.
Share
More from David Thomas
That is boilerplate language that is used. This is something that we do virtually every year because there are always accounting errors, and this allows for the correcting of the accounting errors.
is the gentleman supposed to respond to the point of order, or is he allowed to make a partisan political speech which is not germane to the point of order? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman is allowed to speak on the point of order…
I certainly agree it would be a mistake to send any message that we are not in support of our troops and, indeed, that is what voting on one message would do. Certainly, there are different views in the Senate and legitimately so. We…
I also want to be on record as being opposed to a theocracy. And I will tell you that today, shortly, democracy will be demonstrated when the House of Representatives determines whether or not it sends this compromise measure over to the…





